Who Wants Bad 409a Compliance?

January 6, 2014 at 12:45 pm 1 comment

We spend our days immersed in IRC 409a valuations, advising clients and those charged with overseeing clients’ 409a compliance. If you are among the fortunate few who have not encountered this IRS rule, one of its provisions requires employers to issue stock options and SARs with exercise prices set to no less than fair market value – and have defensible and reasonable argument as to the methodology used for determining fair market value or face significant penalties and interest.

A valuation firm’s ability to positively make the case before tax or accounting auditors is an important criterion to selecting the valuator; however, often lost in the discussion is whether the outcome meets the good intentions of management. Most incentive equity awards are intended to be just that – an incentive. One of the key components to that incentive calculation is the exercise price set for the award. Ultimately, the size of the incentive will be measured by the difference between the exercise price and sale price for any particular grant, so getting the exercise price right makes a difference.

A Proper 409a Achieves a Balance

An award priced too high fails to provide an incentive to the recipient. An award priced too low will fail accounting and tax audit and result in significant penalties, interest, expenses, and perhaps more importantly, will be extremely demoralizing on other recipients, whose incentive awards may also be at risk of forfeiture.

Bottom line, there is good compliance (which provides the intended incentive and will stand up to challenge) and bad compliance (which provides no incentive or fails audit). The best chance for good compliance involves early engagement with a qualified, experienced valuator familiar with 409a’s intricacies and traps who knows how to defend his/her valuation.

    John Heath is Executive Vice President, Valuations & Financial Advisory Services of The Brenner Group. John joined The Brenner Group® in 1994 and manages the firm’s Valuations and Financial Advisory Services Groups. John has more than thirty-five years of experience in corporate finance, and has assisted more than 600 companies with financing, public underwritings, mergers, acquisitions, and valuations. Prior to joining The Brenner Group, John held executive management positions at Smith Barney, The First National Bank of Chicago, and Price Waterhouse. He received an MBA in Finance from The Wharton School of Business, and a BA degree from the University of Pennsylvania. John is a member and Accredited Senior Appraiser of the American Society of Appraisers and a member of the Appraisal Issues Task Force.

    Read more about Silicon Valley news, trends, and commentary in The Brenner Banner

    Entry filed under: Financial Advisory, Interim Management, Valuations.

Startup Landscape in CA: Changing or More of the Same? Southern California Startup Scene – Perspectives from Silicon Valley (Part 1)

1 Comment Add your own

  • 1. wine bar  |  February 27, 2014 at 10:21 pm

    This website was… how do I say it? Relevant!!
    Finally I’ve found something which helped me.

    Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


About…

Silicon Valley finance and accounting issues, trends, and commentary from The Brenner Group.   (more)


Recent Posts

Archives